Gun penetration table

It had good AT performance, and a more potent HE round than the M3 75mm gun. When tested against the British 17 pounder gun, the M3 had slightly inferior performance, but was more accurate. The gun was intended for tank use, but the British Tanks meant for it had to many developmental problems, and were not going to be ready by Normandy landings, so the Sherman Firefly was born. These tanks did not have a stabilized gun or wet ammo racks, but did have the large hatch hull. It is most accurate in predictions for British and German shells, while Japanese and American shells suffer slightly. Another problem was the gun was not a huge improvement over the M3 75mm as a tank killer, and was not as good as an HE thrower.

CAMD RF If you've seen it before, you also have heard criticism aimed its way. And if your looking for penetration-stats and gun stats, then for christs sake stay away from Battlefield. The two go hand in hand. Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War Two. Schiffer Military History, Therefore, these tests give a better indication of how a tank would perform on the battlefield.

Another important area that has not been included is edge effects, a projectile striking an armour plate close to edges or holes in the armour has a higher probability of penetrating. The Effective Limit may be at a velocity equal to or above Holing Limit, or it may be impossible at any striking velocity under the given impact conditions. At the site wwiivehicles. With regard to German armor hardnesses, the curves do not reflect the sudden changes in resistance which could occur as plate hardness changes in a step function with thickness variations. Naval Gun Armor Penetration Tables By Robert Lundgren and Richard Worth Updated 27 November These tables provide theoretical data on the results of naval shell impacts against armor in the World War II context.